Saturday, December 20, 2008

Is global warming preventing an Ice Age?

Dec. 17, 2008
Courtesy Uni­ver­s­ity of Wis­con­sin-Mad­i­son
and World Science staff
Al­though hu­man-caused glob­al warm­ing is po­ten­tially lead­ing the world in­to ec­o­log­i­cal ca­tas­tro­phe, it may al­so be spar­ing us from one of the Earth's per­i­od­ic ice ages, some re­search­ers say.

The claim, even if cor­rect, by no means in­di­cate glob­al warm­ing is good: its fu­ture ef­fects are quite un­known, sci­en­tists say, whe­re­as ice ages, while cer­tainly un­pleas­ant, at least have prece­dents.

Al­though hu­man-caused glob­al warm­ing is po­ten­tially lead­ing the world in­to ec­o­log­i­cal ca­tas­tro­phe, it may al­so be spar­ing us from one of the Earth's per­i­od­ic ice ages, some re­search­ers say. (Im­age cour­tesy USGS)

But as a mat­ter of sci­en­tif­ic cu­ri­os­ity, it's worth not­ing that "in­creased gla­cia­tion... would probably be hap­pen­ing to­day" if hu­mans weren't he­re, said John Kutz­bach, a cli­mate mod­el­er at the Uni­ver­s­ity of Wis­con­sin-Mad­i­son.

The theory is reminiscent of another re­cent piece of re­search, sug­gest­ing a bout of glo­bal warm­ing may have kept Earth from to­tally freez­ing over hun­dreds of mil­lions of years ago. Only now, re­search­ers, say, some­thing similar could be hap­pening to­day.

The con­tro­ver­sial idea—first pro­posed by Uni­ver­s­ity of Vir­gin­ia cli­ma­tolo­g­ist Wil­liam F. Rud­di­man—is based on the con­ten­ti­on that hu­man-induced glob­al warm­ing started long be­fore it's gen­er­ally ac­cept­ed to have be­gun.

The com­mon wis­dom is that the ad­vent of the steam en­gine and the coal-fueled in­dus­t­ri­al age two cen­turies ago marked the be­gin­ning of hu­man in­flu­ence on glob­al cli­mate. But Kutz­bach and like­minded sci­en­tists con­tend it really started thou­sands of years ago with large-scale ag­ri­cul­ture in Asia and ex­ten­sive de­for­esta­tion in Eu­rope.

Al­though these pro­cesses would have been a much weaker in­flu­ence on cli­mate than in­dus­t­ri­al ac­ti­vity, their ef­fect be­comes im­por­tant be­cause of the long­er time per­i­od in­volved, said Ste­phen Vav­rus, a cli­ma­tolo­g­ist at the uni­ver­s­ity.

Both an­cient and mod­ern glob­al warm­ing would have had the same source: the re­lease in­to the atmosphere of so-called green­house gas­es that act like a blan­ket, trap­ping heat on Earth.

Green­house gas­es would have tak­en the form of meth­ane from ter­raced rice pad­dies in Asia and car­bon di­ox­ide from burn­ing forests in Eu­rope. The re­sult­ing warm­er atmosphere would have heat­ed the oceans, mak­ing them much less ef­fi­cient store­hous­es of car­bon di­ox­ide, re­in­forc­ing glob­al warm­ing, ac­cord­ing to Kutz­bach and Vav­rus.

The pa­ir pre­sented their re­search along with Gwe­naëlle Phi­lip­pon of the Sac­lay Cen­ter of Stud­ies in L'Orme des Me­ri­siers, France, at a meet­ing of the Amer­i­can Geo­phys­i­cal Un­ion in San Fran­cis­co Dec. 17.

"No one dis­putes the large rate of in­crease in green­house gas­es with the In­dus­t­ri­al Revoluti­on," Kutz­bach notes. "The large-scale burn­ing of coal for in­dustry has swamped eve­ry­thing else" in the rec­ord, he added.

But look­ing ear­li­er, us­ing cli­mat­ic ar­chives such as 850,000-year-old ice from Ant­arc­ti­ca, sci­en­tists are teas­ing out ev­i­dence of past green­house gas­es in the form of fos­sil air trapped in the ice, the group said. That an­cient air, the re­search­ers said, con­tains the sig­na­ture of in­creased lev­els of at­mos­pher­ic meth­ane and car­bon di­ox­ide be­gin­ning thou­sands of years be­fore the in­dus­t­ri­al age.

"Be­tween 5,000 and 8,000 years ago, both meth­ane and car­bon di­ox­ide started an up­ward trend," ex­plains Kutz­bach.

Ice ages, or gla­cial per­i­ods, have oc­curred at reg­u­lar 100,000-year in­ter­vals dur­ing the last milli­on years. Each per­i­od has been paced by reg­u­lar and pre­dict­a­ble changes in the or­bit of the Earth known as Mi­lankovitch cy­cles, a mech­an­ism thought to kick start gla­cial cy­cles, Kutzbach and col­leagues ex­plained.

"We're at a very fa­vor­a­ble state right now for in­creased glacia­tion," said Kutz­bach. "Na­ture is fa­vor­ing it at this time in or­bital cy­cles." Im­por­tant­ly, the new re­search un­der­scores the key role of green­house gas­es in in­flu­enc­ing Earth's cli­mate, he added. Whe­reas de­creas­ing green­house gas­es in the past helped in­i­ti­ate glacia­tions, the early ag­ri­cul­tur­al and re­cent in­dus­t­ri­al in­creases in green­house gas­es may be fore­stalling them, say Kutz­bach and Vav­rus.

__________________________________________________________________________
 
it is percieved, that because the earth's eccentric orbit increases the distance from the earth to the sun, it cools  creating the conditions that have caused glacial ice ages...this might cause some to look at the above research and say that man, in his infinite simple mindedness has spared himself from the frigid tomb, but that isn't what threatens us most...we may have averted cryogenic armagedden but that salvation only means that life will become increasingly obstacle oriented for the human species...where there is now scenic and bountiful surroundings might become barren  lunar landscapes with torrencial floods that do nothing to alleviate drought conditions...
 
coastal areas will be increasingly battered by ever larger and more horrendous tropical and hurrican forces storms that will, largley wipe out all life zones within miles of the coast...think katrina and ivan on a regular schedual, maybe worse...
 
forget about arguing and going to war over oil...the future will surely see man killing on unprecedented  scales over water...and food...as hurricain size tornados clear paths across the central U.S. destroying the breadbasket of America...
 
It is more important than ever to come to grips with the scenarios presented here and endeavor to develope resources that deliver us from dependence on foreign powers that don't have our best interests on their minds...

No comments: